Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom Houseman's avatar

"The misunderstanding is cleared up, the miners stop destroying eggs, and the Horta babies, when they're hatched, start tunneling out valuable minerals, enriching the miners."

This seems like another important aspect of this kind of colonization narrative: the win-win solution. Colonizers colonize because it is enormously profitable (at least in the short term). Ending colonization almost always means that the colonizers and those who benefit from colonization will lose money, either because of profit decreases or cost increases. But this episode seems to depict the magnanimity of the miners (full disclosure: I haven't seen the episode) as a net gain for both groups.

What if that hadn't been the outcome? What if the miners had lost all of their profits? What if the Hortas had decided not to share the minerals with the miners? Would that make the end result worse? From a human rights perspective, of course not, but from a macroeconomic perspective, yes.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts