Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dana Longley's avatar

"Trump and MAGA appear to be working from a definition of “free speech” which means that the president is free to say anything—which effectively means the president can order anything, or do anything, without consequences. Reversing free speech to mean freedom for the president rather than freedom from the president effectively becomes an argument to allow the president—or at least a certain president—to ignore the constraint of law." - well said! If only the Dems would all say the same thing loudly and in unison...

Expand full comment
Caz Hart's avatar

Not merely actions, because those actions resulted in leaving legally executed document trails, in the knowledge that the contents were untrue. Not tweets, not interviews, not a rant at a rally. At Trump's behest, those documents were signed, repeatedly, with a specific intent.

As you say, no one is after his free speech rights, no one is coming for anyone's free speech rights, despite Trump's high rotation assertion; and Fox news. But sign lots of false statements, knowing that they're false? Different ballpark.

Long wait to see how all of this plays out.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts