Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert Spottswood, M.A.'s avatar

Hm.

We watched this when our kids were little.

It's a movie for little kids; like picture books for little kids. Little kids live in feelings and depend on us adults to help them co-regulate any bigger harder feelings.

I.e. I think this movie has its place and correctly identified its audience.

I think you enjoy the horror movies you review because you are no longer little.

When I was little I was taken by a parent to see Bambi. As the forest fire disappeared whatever Bambi had for parents the sense of abandonment -- kids worst nightmare -- was overwhelming, and I sobbed until we left early.

Disney is still hard right with child abandonment themes. Not unlike ICE.

Rachel Baldes's avatar

At least for me I always felt like the mother was recovering from tuberculosis and thus it made sense she'd be unable to visit (or return to her family) when she has symptoms of a cold. This explanation satisfies why the children aren't able to visit her often as well. This sort of situation was pretty universal in the last decades before antibiotics no matter where you lived, my grandmother and her siblings lived without their mother for several years of their childhoods while she was at Waverly Sanitarium. The two older children were put in a kind of foster home for most of the duration. They were lucky, my great-grandmother did recover and lived until the mid-1990s. While the actual Japan of the 1950s would have shown a much different reality, the concept of a more pastoral familiar historical time before television makes sense to me.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?