Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JAP's avatar

Totally agree on Bogart. I liked the movie but couldn’t believe she would fall for a not so handsome man who was old before his time. Very distracting.

Sunset & Fire's avatar

Thank you! I rewatched this recently after many years, and two things struck me that I hadn't sussed before. First, that Sabrina was sent to "cooking school" (apparently a rigorous French culinary acadamy where sauces take 2 months of study) and other than pretending to make an omelette with crackers in Linus's office, there's not even a hint that she has marketable skills, or should or will be seeking a job. Of course that's just a plot device to give her a Parisian glow-up; in 1954, snagging a man was more a woman's job than doing paid work, even kitchen-based work. (I'll have to watch the 1995 version uuuugggghhh to see if they updated that trope.) Then there's marriage. Neither David - whose fiancee is planning his fifth(?) Bezosian wedding extravaganza - nor Linus even hints at marrying Sabrina. When Linus arranges for her to go back to Paris but (unbeknownst to her) without him, David puts a gossip item in the newspaper about Linus Larrabee and Sabrina "taking adjacent deck chairs" on the steamer to Paris, to push Linus into action. David has arranged a police escort to the docks and a tugboat to take Linus to the departing ship, but not an officiant to marry them, or even a marriage license. (The elaborate discussion of the two cabins Linus paid for though he didn't intend to go is for the censors; we know there's an unlocked door between them, wink-wink.) I also have a few things to say about the rapaciousness of the Larrabee family and the ungodly mid-century celebration of extractive wealth, but I'll leave that for another time.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?