I am old enough to remember when Du shot and killed Latasha Harlins, back in 1991. Du got probation. Latasha had the $2.00 to pay for the orange juice in her hand. She was not shoplifting.
Nothing has changed in LA to prevent this from happening again.
I was born in Watts, LA. My parents lived there during 1965 rebellion for the shooting of a Black teenager by the LA police. It’s called the Watts riots, but of course it wasn’t a riot.
We were lucky to move out of Watts, or my sisters could have been Latasha.
Everything stays the same- time is neutral and does nothing. That said- “we are all more than the worst thing we have ever done.” Brian Stevenson
A lot of genre novels, particularly mysteries that hinge on a big reveal or twist at the end (which I don't think this great book does, but just explaining) limit POV and withhold facts based on POV or timeline...but I'm sure you get that. I agree it's not "cheating" - it's good writing, and spotlighting characters before a seismic choice or event to contextualize how they've changed is a smart play.
I am old enough to remember when Du shot and killed Latasha Harlins, back in 1991. Du got probation. Latasha had the $2.00 to pay for the orange juice in her hand. She was not shoplifting.
Nothing has changed in LA to prevent this from happening again.
I was born in Watts, LA. My parents lived there during 1965 rebellion for the shooting of a Black teenager by the LA police. It’s called the Watts riots, but of course it wasn’t a riot.
We were lucky to move out of Watts, or my sisters could have been Latasha.
Everything stays the same- time is neutral and does nothing. That said- “we are all more than the worst thing we have ever done.” Brian Stevenson
https://eji.org/about/
A lot of genre novels, particularly mysteries that hinge on a big reveal or twist at the end (which I don't think this great book does, but just explaining) limit POV and withhold facts based on POV or timeline...but I'm sure you get that. I agree it's not "cheating" - it's good writing, and spotlighting characters before a seismic choice or event to contextualize how they've changed is a smart play.
true! I should have made it clearer that it’s the reason for the twists rather than the twists themselves that are the key here.
Very cool. Thanks for explaining this, as it touches some sense that it is very true.
Ah. It's the 𝑂𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝐵𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑘 trick.