Women Outnumber Men In College Because of Sexism
Women Outnumber Men In College Because of Sexism
No, not sexism against men. The usual kind of sexism.
Today, more women than men attend and graduate from college. The media, and especially the right has framed this as a problem of male abandonment and ennui. “A Generation of American Men Give Up On College,” the Wall Street Journal wailed. “Inequalities of this magnitude are a cause for concern, regardless of their direction,” the Brookings institute furrowed. Some colleges have lowered standards for men in order to achieve gender parity in the classroom.
The assumption driving this little moral panic is that (untrustworthy, feminist, leftist) educators, and the culture at large, are discriminating against or discouraging men from entering college. The truth, though, is that women are pushed to college because of ongoing discrimination against women. The worry that men are falling behind is not really about defending men. It’s a backlash to the way that education and schooling are in fact redressing historical inequities.
____
This would be where I’d put a paywall. But! I’d rather you read the piece. So, if you find it useful or valuable, consider becoming a contributor? I can only keep writing with your help.
_____
Women want education because they’re discriminated against
The prevalence of women on college campuses is a major historical shift. For decades, college education was considered the prerogative of men and women were actively discouraged from pursuing post-secondary degrees. In the early years of the 20th century, women rarely got four-year degrees at elite universities, or indeed, at any universities. As late as 1970, only 8% of women 25 and over had a college degree compared to 14% of men.
Women fell even further behind in the 80s. But then they started to make up ground. By 2010, the genders were about even, with 30% of each having college degrees. In 2021, women had surpassed men, with 39.1% of those over 25 holding a college degree compared to only 36.6% of men.
So, what happened? Did the evil feminists seize all of our institutions and inject them with eau de castrating misandry? Did the liberals destroy manly upward mobility with a curriculum of gender studies and affirmative action?
No and ffs no. What happened is just that colleges moved somewhat towards egalitarianism, and as a result women began to see them as a desperately needed tool to balance out the rest of society’s sexism.
Women are still largely excluded—often by on-the-job harassment and employer discrimination— from the careers that provide a middle-class income without a college degree. Women are 4% of firefighters, only 13% of police officers, 14% of construction workers. They are only 1.4% of plumbers and 2.3% of electricians. Women inherit only 31% of family businesses—which indicates that even women’s parents discriminate against them when it comes to employment.
There are a couple of exceptions here; flight attendants don’t necessarily require a college degree, and they are about 75% women. Women without degrees have also traditionally dominated the secretarial field—but that’s been changing. In 1990 only 9% of secretaries had college degrees; now it’s 33%.
College is a gender equalizer
Despite these exceptions, it’s overwhelmingly men who can afford to skip college—and that’s reflected in attitudes and earnings. Men are more likely than women to say they didn’t attend college because they didn’t want to (34% to 25%). They are also, significantly, more likely to say they didn’t attend college because they didn’t need it for their career (26% to 20%.)
Men’s sense that they need college less is born out in earnings. Researchers Oksana Leukhina and Amy Smaldone ran the numbers and found that men without a college degree earn about $12/hour in 2015 dollars, while women make 25% less, or $9/hour. Men with an associate degree earn 22% more, but women with the same degree earn 27% more. Men with a bachelor’s earn 62% more than those without any degree; women earn a 67% increase.
Without a college degree, women make less money than their male counterparts. More education boosts both male and female earnings—but it boosts women’s earnings more, so women with degrees are closer in earnings to their male counterparts. Leukhina and Smaldone conclude:
What these numbers reveal is that, indeed, getting more education is an important way to close the gender pay gap. College entry—whether it is to get an AS or a BS—helps women gain access to careers where they have a comparative advantage (e.g., office work). Men on the other hand have better access to lucrative careers that don’t require a college degree (e.g., construction work). This appears to be the most reasonable explanation for why women outnumber men in college.
The researchers add, “there is no reason to expect a perfect gender balance in college. Women and men face different incentives and should be expected to make different choices.” The argument there is meant to refute the moral panic about not enough men in college.
But in doing so, it normalizes and whitewashes sexism against women. Women need college because they face systematic discrimination across a range of careers. Women firefighters report that sexist and racist harassment is endemic in the industry. Female police officers report the same. So do construction workers. So do women in manufacturing.
Women do not freely choose to avoid these careers. They are actively prevented from entering them by sexist hiring practices and the reality of vicious harassment on the job. The “different incentives” women face are misogyny and sexism. There are more women in college not because of discrimination against men, but because of discrimination against women.
The GOP hates college because it helps women
College helps women overcome—or at least it helps them occasionally avoid the worst of—sexism. The current GOP assault on education should be understood in that context.
When the right works to defund public education, or denigrates four-year schools in favor of vocational education, or attacks DEI programs—they aren’t doing those things because education is failing. They do those things because education is succeeding in providing some limited upward mobility for people at the bottom of the hierarchy. Black people (of every gender) with college degrees get an important earnings boost. And women (of every race) close the gender-pay gap when they earn associate or bachelor degrees.
The current right wing war on higher education is of a piece with the current right wing hand-wringing about college failing men. Conservatives want to preserve and expand (white, heteronormative) patriarchy. Colleges challenge that hierarchy—not because colleges are dens of leftist critical race theory feminist indoctrination, but because colleges give women (and other marginalized people too) a chance to gain credentials that give them options in a system rigged against them.
Higher education is not discriminating against men. It’s simply offering women, in at least a limited way, the ability to fight discrimination. Making college affordable and accessible, and canceling student debt, makes the United States more equal by helping less affluent people, and especially by helping less affluent women. That’s why conservatives oppose those policies. And it’s why progressives are, and should be, committed to supporting them.
Very informative. Being conservative in America used to mean, among other things, being in favor of inhibiting changes to cultural institutions in order to retain what they considered to be an acceptable status quo. That included the roles of women, and the status of POC.
Today, the dominant, decidedly non-conservative outlook on the right is one of advocating radical changes to existing institutions in order to return to a perceived cultural ideal. This requires reversing any signs of evolving into a more perfect union of equality and equity for all.
I am very glad you wrote this! People don't know it.
It's surprising because it seems so obvious. When I first heard the statistic, it was the first thing I thought. One can simply observe it. Maybe you have to come from a working class community.
In the public sector, where some good jobs remain, the men can much more easily become firemen, cops, various types of maintenance workers (the kind that require technical skills)...in the private sector, there's construction and many trades open to men. Women who are going into the jobs that seem accessible to them HAVE to have college degrees to make even close to the same income--to be a teacher, a nurse, or any municipal or county or state work in the public sector--all the women's jobs tend to require degrees. Pink collar jobs require degrees more and more--like paralegal, etc. As you point out! Even in tech, some of the jobs don't require a degree and if they don't and they are well-paid they are dominated by men.
So, in my family, to move up in the world, a lot of the women become teachers. The women teachers observed to me that teachers often date cops and others in law enforcement type jobs (which is also true of some of my female relatives), which has a mixed ratio of success. But the cops and firefighters, etc. make more money over time. They are the same class status, even though the women have degrees. Their degree does not translate into the 'elite status' the right wing is so anxious about. Teachers have less social status than firemen and police. However, some of the women do move into the professions of higher pay and status because they are motivated to do so given that they have to seek higher education. And this is likely what the right is panicking about, among other things.
The teachers stay flat broke, though, even though they have masters' degrees. They barely get raises and if they're single moms, they are basically poor and cannot support themselves.
One of my female cousins just qualified to become a firefighter though! Hooray!
It's a very easily deniable kind of sexism because people would say 'you are not doing the SAME JOB. Or 'this job is not as difficult' instead of saying 'women dominate this profession.' Even online sometimes the men's rights people will claim that men are 'not allowed' to become teachers and nurses because of 'fears of pedophilia' (which is utter nonsense...schools are always looking for male teachers and my children have had a number of male teachers, even in preschool....and this is GOOD for them to look for male teachers.) Caretaking work is not seen as work as it is 'women's work' even though it is completely essential to society--perhaps the most essential thing besides growing food, something we cannot survive without. Women are expected to 'give' caretaking so the value for this as labor (which it is) in our culture is very low. However, all these roles, particularly teaching and nursing, require high levels of education and training. They are professions!
The right wing knows that they would cannibalize and destroy capitalism with their attacks on women in professions and their education. I doubt they are this irrational, although many might be. Like immigration and other of their hobbyhorses, the goal is not to end the practice that they squawk about but to make the people we are all dependent on lower in status, and afraid of their position so they can be more exploitable.