
At the end of last week we learned that the Trump administration has apparently deported a 2-year-old American citizen with no due process.
I do not really have the ability to adequately express how horrific this is. The judge in the case, Terry Doughty, a Trump appointee, also seems enraged and disgusted.
Doughty here probably voted for Trump, of course. He seems pretty convinced that agents deporting American children without trial is bad. He presumably does not think it is what he voted for.
Is he right?
__
This is where I would paywall this piece if there were a paywall. However, I hate paywalls. So I am dependent on you to support me without coercion! If you find my writing valuable, and read the rest of the piece, consider becoming a paid subscriber. It’s $5/month, $50/year.
Some things Trump voters didn’t vote for
Voters—even well-informed voters like Doughty—tend to vote in ways that do not necessarily make a lot of sense. Voting is mostly driven by identity, especially partisan identities and racial identities. Policies factor in to some degree, but more often those policies are excuses rather than drivers.
In other words, people will decide to vote for a person (say, Trump) for reasons of identity (say, because the are white Republicans) and then will back and fill policy “reasons” to justify their vote. (For example, they might say they voted for Trump to solve the crisis at the border, which does not in fact exist.)
Trump is a very bad politician, which means, among other things, that he doesn’t really know what voters expect of him (because he doesn’t listen to them at all) and is in any case incapable of paying attention to policy in enough detail to even attempt to give voters what they want. In that context, I think it is the case that there are some policies and initiatives which Trump voters really did not vote for and can say with a fairly clear conscience that they did not want.
Thus, I do not think Trump voters cast their ballots to gut the VA, or to destroy Social Security, or to end FEMA and disaster preparedness. These are things Trump did not promise to do in the campaign; on the contrary, he promised to do better than Biden on disaster aid, and he claimed he would not touch Social Security. You can certainly say that Trump voters were bounders and fools to trust him to keep his promises here. But being fooled isn’t exactly a moral failure. On these issues, Trump set out to fool his voters, as he set out to fool those who enrolled in Trump University. He scammed them, and being scammed is not the fault of the people who are scammed. It’s the fault of those doing the scamming.
And some things they did
On immigration and deportation, however, the calculus is a little different. Trump said repeatedly that he would deport huge numbers of people; the exact figure varied, but sometimes it got as high as 30 million—a terrifying number. He demonized immigrants too in inflammatory and ugly ways—lying about legal Haitian immigrants and saying that they were eating people’s pets, for instance, even as state Republican officials in Ohio begged him to stop.
Trump made it very clear that he wanted to harm vulnerable people who he considered subhuman and disposable. And people who voted for him knew that. They pulled the lever hoping he would hurt those they too considered subhuman and disposable.
Now, I think many Trump voters didn’t necessarily realize the extent of Trump’s hatred. Luterhan pastor Martin Niemöller cheered on Hitler hoping he would get the Jews, and then was horrified when Hitler went after, not just practicing Jews, but Jewish Lutheran converts. Similarly, I think a lot of Trump voters were hoping he would go after immigrants who deserved to suffer, and have been startled that Trump defines “immigrants who deserve to suffer” as “two-year old American citizens who aren’t white.”
I am glad that Niemöller was willing to protect Jewish converts, and that he eventually figured out that supporting Hitler was a mistake. But I don’t think it’s right to say that Niemöller’s support for Hitler was a mistake. Niemöller hated Jews; Hitler promised to make hating Jews policy. Hitler kept his promise; Niemöller just belatedly realized that the hatred in his own heart was in fact hatred, and led inevitably to escalating atrocities.
In the same way, Trump voters (like presumably Judge Doughty) pulled the lever in the voting booth in the name of hatred and persecuting immigrants. That was Trump’s promise, and everyone, including I think low information voters, knew that that was Trump’s promise. Harming immigrants was the core theme of Trump’s campaign; it received a great deal of coverage. At the very least, you wouldn’t vote for him without figuring that it was okay for the government to target immigrants—and non-white people—if it wanted to, as a treat.
The problem with letting Trump voters off the hook
Even if Trump voters did a Niemöller and did in fact vote for atrocities and bigotry, wouldn’t it be wiser (as many argue) not to press the issue? If Judge Doughty (like Niemöller before him) is willing to turn on the regime that brung him, shouldn’t that be sufficient? Why insist on emphasizing moral culpability for (six months’) past actions when what we need to do is build a coalition going forward?
I think we should certainly applaud Doughty, and welcome anyone who wants to oppose Trump. But if we’re going to defeat fascism, we need to be clear what fascism we are fighting. It’s not enough to say, “Okay, well, bigotry and hatred of immigrants is fine up to a point, but we need to delimit that more carefully. Let’s put rules in place that make it okay to murder practicing Jews, but not Jewish converts. Then all will be well!”
Trump called on people to vote for hate. And they voted for hate. And now we are living in a fascist authoritarian nightmare. We will not get out of that nightmare by insisting that we need to protect only the best victims, and that as long as we do that, we can throw everyone else into slave labor camps or the nearest convenient ditch.
As Niemöller eventually realized, hate and fascism take you only one place. We need to make it clear that the targeting of toddlers, the elimination of due process, the arrest of judges—these are not accidental technical cases of overreach. This is what Trump promised; this is what you get when you demonize your neighbors and wallow in a self-aggrandizing orgy of hate.
Yes, Trump voters voted for this. And if we want to ever get this country to a better place, those voters need to understand that Trump, in this area at least, did not betray them. They betrayed themselves. And worse, they betrayed that two-year old child.
I am heartily sick of the phrase “I didn’t vote for THIS!” from Trump voters. Yes you did. When you vote for a bad man, a man with no character, zero integrity, no morality, no patriotism, an ignorant man, this is what you get.
This is why I have no patience for people who vote for a specific issue, say immigration, without considering the person they’re putting in power. Doesn’t character matter anymore in America? Shouldn’t the President be, at the very least, a decent person?
Apparently not.
I think you cant undercount the effect of shitty corporate media, many people believed Biden just let criminals come into the country unvetted and they were running around killing people and Trump was going to finally stop the lawlessness by deporting the "rapists and murderers" Only an uninformed, stupid or willfully ignorant person could believe this but that false beleif made entirely possible by corporate media quoting Trump and using GOP framing in all of its headlines. The uniformed don't read NY times or WAPO but they scroll through headlines on apple news or get their news through social which is influenced by NY Times and WAPO. Corporate media, by not speaking plainly and succinctly and using shitty misleading headlines whitewashed and legitimized this stupid belief of the ignorant.