Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr. Jim Salvucci's avatar

I don’t disagree with anything in this piece, but there is an element that has been consistently deemphasized and even ignored by many analyses.

The Democratic establishment foisted Janet Mills on the electorate. She seems a decent governor and did stand up to Trump when others were cowering. Good for her. But she also is a standard-issue moderate and a septuagenarian when the electorate is looking for young leftists. I think the fact that Platner was the antidote to all that played a large role in progressives backing him and turning a blind eye to his myriad flaws that were literally tattooed on his chest.

That’s not an excuse for Platnerphilia, nor is it a counterpoint to your argument. I just want to point out the role of the Democratic establishment in creating this debacle. By constantly and perversely propping up the same-old, same-old, they’re making the ballot safe for future Platners.

A Declining Democracy's avatar

Well said. Honestly, I think we just need to apply the "mensch" test to every candidate. Is s/he or is s/he not a mensch? And if the answer is no, we just need to walk away and stop making excuses for them. Platner failed the mensch test the minute that tattoo came to light.

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?