The argument ignores some ugly history.
The question should be: is this content relevant to the plot of the movie, or is it just being used as exploitative time-filler? There is a difference...
to some degree there's a difference...but exploitative time filler doesn't need to be sexy, and in any case can have its charms.
A lot of movies that are fairly canonical—Psycho, Carrie, Halloween—are sleazy exploitation crap...
The question should be: is this content relevant to the plot of the movie, or is it just being used as exploitative time-filler? There is a difference...
to some degree there's a difference...but exploitative time filler doesn't need to be sexy, and in any case can have its charms.
A lot of movies that are fairly canonical—Psycho, Carrie, Halloween—are sleazy exploitation crap...