The letter is first of all just asking substack’s founders not to promote white nationalists. If you oppose all censorship, you could push for them to stop banning adult content as a start.
The letter is first of all just asking substack’s founders not to promote white nationalists. If you oppose all censorship, you could push for them to stop banning adult content as a start.
The letter is first of all just asking substack’s founders not to promote white nationalists. If you oppose all censorship, you could push for them to stop banning adult content as a start.
what kind of impartial, logically coherent rules do you think we should adopt ?
I just answered you. They can enforce their current tos. And stop banning adult content.
i see, so you're suggesting the current TOS is logically coherent and impartial
Seems like a reasonable place to start.
zoiks