It’s far from the nuts and bolts stuff I usually read, but I thought you did a good job of keeping it accessible. You avoided the psycho-babel that makes a lot of the critical examination of art incomprehensible to average folk.
It's definitely a me thing....I can't process contemporary philosophy speak...or legalese...I get impatient with myself for not being able to keep up (something I'm usually pretty good at)
I know for a FACT that you are a very good and clear writer and that you write really well on conceptually difficult subjects and frames (it's why I became a subscriber!) so I trust your capacity to clarify these kinds of concepts...Perhaps there IS no 'clearer' more concise way to write about certain things, which raises other questions...
Almost over my head, but fascinating. Thank you.
It’s far from the nuts and bolts stuff I usually read, but I thought you did a good job of keeping it accessible. You avoided the psycho-babel that makes a lot of the critical examination of art incomprehensible to average folk.
I'm afraid this one was over my head...
:(
ack; I tried to make it at least somewhat accessible! I guess it doesn't always work...
I loved it! I think you are on target
And I appreciate that!
It's definitely a me thing....I can't process contemporary philosophy speak...or legalese...I get impatient with myself for not being able to keep up (something I'm usually pretty good at)
I know for a FACT that you are a very good and clear writer and that you write really well on conceptually difficult subjects and frames (it's why I became a subscriber!) so I trust your capacity to clarify these kinds of concepts...Perhaps there IS no 'clearer' more concise way to write about certain things, which raises other questions...